A November New York State casino referendum for voters has one lawyer questioning the ballot’s wording
In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote for a referendum that would allow several new casino resorts become built through the state. But if one Brooklyn attorney is effective, that referendum will be halted due to language in the ballot question which he claims violates state law.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum features a range ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposition in a light that is unmistakably positive. For instance, the concern mentions ‘promoting job growth, increasing aid to schools and allowing local governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was approved by the State Board of Elections in July.
But now, attorney Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York law. According to case filed into the New York State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the continuing State Constitution’s prohibition on the use of general public profit the aid of ‘private undertakings.’
‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you cannot use public cash to sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the only one who has brought up difficulties with the language within the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also view it as one-sided, and groups that are religious also noted the language used when telling paris Читати далі…